6.8
82.1 %
94.1 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 82.1%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 5.2 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 21.7 | 83.8% | 1.0 |
| Article, other | 0.1 | NA | 0.6 | 0.3 | NA | NA | NA | 1.1 | 68.5% | 0.7 |
| Conference paper, peer review | NA | 0.3 | NA | 0.2 | NA | 0.2 | NA | 0.8 | 33.3% | 0.2 |
| Conference paper, other | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | NA | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 5.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Book | 0.2 | NA | 0.2 | NA | 0.5 | NA | NA | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Chapter in book | 1.7 | 3.8 | NA | 1.5 | 0.3 | NA | 2.0 | 9.3 | 0.0% | 0.8 |
| Article, book review | NA | 0.5 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.5 | 100.0% | 0.0 |
| Report | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.3 | NA | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 10 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 53 | 83.0% | 1 |
| Article, other | 1 | NA | 2 | 1 | NA | NA | NA | 4 | 75.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 3 | 33.3% | 0 |
| Conference paper, other | 2 | 3 | 2 | NA | 2 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Book | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 3 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | 5 | 6 | NA | 2 | 1 | NA | 5 | 19 | 0.0% | 1 |
| Article, book review | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 100.0% | 0 |
| Report | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 4.0 | 14.3 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 28.7% |
| 2015 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 25.0% |
| 2016 | 2.0 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 29.2% |
| 2017 | 2.3 | 14.2 | 6.1 | 0.2 | 10.7% |
| 2018 | 1.8 | 8.8 | 4.8 | 0.3 | 18.2% |
| Total | 12.1 | 46.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 23.1% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 7.6 | 0.98 | 1.1 | 14.3% |
| 2015-2017 | 5.5 | 1.17 | 1.0 | 18.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 5.3 | 1.34 | 1.2 | 21.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 6.5 | 1.51 | 1.7 | 25.6% |
| Total | 14.1 | 1.23 | 2.8 | 19.5% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 4 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 54.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 15 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 72.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 7.1 | 0.80 | 0.5 | 7.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 5.0 | 0.98 | 0.7 | 13.5% |
| 2016-2018 | 4.8 | 1.15 | 1.3 | 26.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 6.5 | 1.43 | 3.4 | 51.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 7.7 | 1.33 | 3.6 | 47.1% |
| Total | 16.5 | 1.10 | 4.6 | 28.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 15 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 72.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 17 | 2 | 11.8% | 4 | 23.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 14 | 3 | 21.4% | 5 | 35.7% |
| 2016-2018 | 15 | 5 | 33.3% | 5 | 33.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 16 | 7 | 43.8% | 7 | 43.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 19 | 6 | 31.6% | 7 | 36.8% |
| Total | 41 | 10 | 24.4% | 14 | 34.1% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 14 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 70.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Denmark | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| France | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum | Other | Sweden | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 |
| Jönköping University College | University College | Sweden | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 |
| Stockholm School of Economics | University College | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| University of Gothenburg | University | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| Lund University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Blekinge Institute of Technology | University College | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Stockholm University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Iowa State University | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Swedish House Finance SHoF | Company | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Copenhagen Business School | University | Denmark | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Northwestern Polytechnical University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Boston College | University College | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) | Institute | Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| University of the West of England, Bristol (UWE Bristol) | University | United Kingdom | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| CESIS | University Other | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Swedish Research Council | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Cambridge | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Karlstad University | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Inha University | University | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Maastricht University | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Ministry of Fincance | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Mälardalen University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) | Other Public | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Politecnico di Milano | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Research Institute For Industrial Economics | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Sogang University | University | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Univ Catholique Louvain UCLouvain | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Université du Québec | University | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Washington University in St. Louis | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| HEC Paris | University College | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) | Institute | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Osaka University | University | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Radboud University Nijmegen | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Manchester | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Maryland, College Park | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Hanken School of Economis | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Loughborough University | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Sør-Trøndelag University College | University College | Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 38.5% |
| 2015 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 40.0% |
| 2016 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 42.9% |
| 2017 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 44.4% |
| 2018 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 62.5% |
| 2019 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 62.5% |
| 2020 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 91.7% |
| Total | 67 | 37 | 1 | 15 | 17 | 4 | 30 | 55.2% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 5.3 | 99.5 | 18.7 | 1.0 | 18.8% |
| 2015 | 3.1 | 41.1 | 13.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.2 | 29.7 | 13.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.1 | 45.4 | 21.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.0 | 27.5 | 13.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 | 37.5 | 10.8 | 0.2 | 4.8% |
| 2020 | 2.9 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 45.7% |
| Total | 21.2 | 285.8 | 13.5 | 2.5 | 11.8% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 9.2 | 1.98 | 1.8 | 19.8% |
| 2015-2017 | 6.8 | 1.73 | 1.6 | 23.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 5.8 | 2.12 | 1.8 | 30.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 7.3 | 2.31 | 3.2 | 44.7% |
| Total | 16.5 | 2.13 | 5.1 | 30.8% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 18 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 10.2 | 1.11 | 3.3 | 32.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 6.8 | 1.29 | 2.5 | 36.6% |
| 2016-2018 | 5.8 | 1.65 | 3.5 | 60.5% |
| 2017-2019 | 7.3 | 2.18 | 5.4 | 74.5% |
| 2018-2020 | 8.4 | 2.19 | 6.3 | 75.1% |
| Total | 20.4 | 1.62 | 10.7 | 52.2% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 23 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 26.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 18 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 38.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 17 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 41.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 19 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 42.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 36.4% |
| Total | 50 | 0 | 0.0% | 17 | 34.0% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 81.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
